Built for Your Workflow.

Explore how litigation teams use ChronoLaw across common case types.

Book demoGet started

Common Litigation Scenarios

Civil Litigation: Large Scale Discovery Review

A team receives 40,000 pages across PDFs, emails, and spreadsheets.

Workflow without ChronoLaw

  • Paralegals and associates spend weeks skimming and organizing
  • Attorney review takes 1 to 2 weeks
  • Prone to missing key facts
  • Re-review required for each additional discovery supplement

Workflow with ChronoLaw

  • Documents uploaded asynchronously
  • Automatic chronology generation with each fact cited and linked to the source document and page
  • Ask questions like, what are the contradictions across the case documents? Answers cited to the source documents and pages

Employment Dispute: Key Communications Timeline

HR provides extensive Slack messages, emails, policy documents, and meeting notes.

Workflow without ChronoLaw

  • Manual sorting through multiple sources
  • Timeline constructed in spreadsheets
  • Fact verification requires manual lookup from the spreadsheet to the source document

Workflow with ChronoLaw

  • Rapid and unified ingestion of documents and conversations
  • Conversations traced to provide context
  • Automatic chronology generation provides context for the dispute with each fact cited and linked

Internal Investigation: Multi Source Fact Reconstruction

General counsel needs to understand events around the potential misuse of funds. Materials include financial spreadsheets, invoices, emails, and interview transcripts.

Workflow without ChronoLaw

  • Arduous and time consuming correlation of events
  • Data inconsistencies reduce clarity
  • Time wasted searching and correlating instead of reasoning

Workflow with ChronoLaw

  • Spreadsheet facts included in chronologies and answers, with citations
  • Narrative or table chronology that is easily shared with internal partners
  • Synthesis of facts revealing relationships between financial records and communications
  • Ask questions to reveal details across the documents like, which invoices correlate with the disputed transactions?