Compare evidence across the matter. Open the source behind a finding.
Before deposition, mediation, motions, or a coverage review, ChronoLaw compares evidence across the documents and the results are immediately verifiable by links to the source. As the file grows, regenerate the relevant intelligence so the analysis incorporates the new material. You keep the judgment.
Work from the file, not a paraphrase of it.
Upload the matter or claim file. ChronoLaw ingests the documents, email, spreadsheets, and other evidence you have and keeps later analysis attached to those sources.
- Multi-format ingestion (PDF, Word, Excel, email, and more)
- OCR and document processing for scanned records
- Large-file handling across document-heavy matters and claims
- Run cases in parallel
- Connected sources across the evidence foundation
- Integrations with the systems your team already uses
See what changed along the way.
Chronological analysis reconstructs sequence and drift in the documents. Use it alongside contradiction, corroboration, and legal or policy comparison. When new documents arrive, regenerate any of the intelligence with the click of a button so the analysis reflects the evolving file.
- Sequence reconstructed from the full file
- Narrative and table views of what happened and what changed
- Source-linked review from every event and finding
- Exportable work product (PDF, text, and CSV)
Loading chronology demo…
Different questions require different kinds of analysis.
Each kind of analysis answers a different professional question about the same file. Layers are not one-time reports: add new documents and regenerate the relevant intelligence so the expanded file is incorporated.
Legal Intelligence
Relate the factual record to potentially relevant law
How does this file relate to a statute, standard, element, or defense worth examining? Legal intelligence frames issues for counsel. It does not determine the legal conclusion or choose strategy. New facts or documents may change which issues or authorities warrant review; regenerate the layer against the expanded file.
- Factual record related to potentially relevant authorities
- Elements, standards, and procedural requirements worth counsel review
- Issue framing that stays tied to sources and not a legal conclusion
Policy and claims intelligence
Analyze the claim record together with the uploaded policy
ChronoLaw surfaces facts that may be relevant to insuring language, exclusions, endorsements, conditions, and definitions; before coverage analysis or reserve review. Coverage stays your call. When new facts arrive, regenerate policy intelligence so the comparison reflects the expanded claim file.
- Fact versus insuring language, exclusion, endorsement, or condition
- Contradictions and independent corroboration in the claim record
- Gaps and changing information after a prior assessment
- Financial support for a claimed amount
- Expert conclusion versus the underlying record
When a carrier form is linked from the team library, coverage and subrogation items can cite that form language.
Contradiction intelligence
Surface where the documents disagree
ChronoLaw flags conflicts and shows the evidence on each side before key deadlines. New testimony, correspondence, or reports may introduce new conflicts or resolve earlier ones; regenerate contradiction intelligence against the expanded file.
- Witness versus witness
- Witness versus document
- Earlier account versus later account
- Expert versus source record
- Disclosure versus financial records
- Claim description versus contemporaneous evidence
Financial Intelligence
Test whether the numbers support the story
Where did funds move? Do disclosures match the statements? Does claimed revenue reconcile with historical records? Financial intelligence tests those questions on a dedicated ledger foundation before mediation, a hearing, or settlement evaluation. New statements, transaction records, or calculations can be incorporated by regenerating the layer.
Corroborating-evidence intelligence
Independent support is not the same as repetition
Repetition is not corroboration. Three documents can repeat the same allegation. That is not the same as an independent source supporting it. ChronoLaw distinguishes an assertion, repetition of that assertion, independent corroboration, and conflicting evidence. New evidence may independently support or undermine existing assertions; regenerate the layer to include the new material.
Missing-evidence intelligence
Surface what appears incomplete without treating absence as proof
A report references an attachment that was never produced. A filing relies on an agreement that is not in the matter. A sequence jumps with no source explaining what happened between events. ChronoLaw surfaces apparent gaps for review. An apparent absence is not proof that something never occurred. When later productions arrive, regenerate missing-evidence intelligence so apparent gaps reflect the expanded file.
The file changes. The analysis changes with it.
Intelligence layers are not one-time reports. Add new documents and regenerate the relevant layer so contradictions, corroboration, sequence, legal or policy connections, and financial findings incorporate the new material. ChronoLaw does not continuously rewrite every finding on its own.
Ask a specific question across the matter.
Ask questions across the documents, then follow the answers and verify with the linked sources. Export the answers as needed.
- Ask a specific question across the complete matter
- Follow every finding back to its source
- Exports and exhibit-ready packages
- Collaboration via expiring share links
- Privilege-aware controls on share and export
Privilege, confidentiality, and verification
ChronoLaw is built for confidential matters and claim files. Using the software does not, by itself, preserve privilege or guarantee compliance. Technical safeguards are below. Counsel still determines legal obligations on each engagement. Security page.
- Encryption in transit
- Encryption at rest
- US-based infrastructure
- Authentication and MFA
- Passkey / WebAuthn support
- Access controls
- Audit records
- Data-deletion workflows
Bring the file in without rebuilding your workflow.
Connect the sources your team already uses. See all integration categories →
01
Google Drive
Import files from Google Drive into a ChronoLaw case workspace.
Dropbox
Connect Dropbox folders and bring matter or claim files into ChronoLaw.
OneDrive
Import from Microsoft OneDrive for teams on Microsoft 365.
Run a closed matter you already know.
Compare ChronoLaw with work you already did. That is a better evaluation than watching generated prose.