Compare the claim with the policy that governs it.
Connect the claim file with what the policy says as both evolve.
ChronoLaw analyzes them together. Coverage stays your call.
The first report is not the last account.
Statements, expert material, and wage records accumulate while the claim evolves. Connecting them is the work that gets harder as the claim grows.
The same claim, examined several ways.
One claim file, read with the policy that governs it.
01
Start from the claim file and the policy
Upload the first report, later statement, claim notes, expert report, wage statements, correspondence, and the policy. ChronoLaw reads those together.
02
See where accounts of the loss conflict
The first report describes one sequence. A later statement changes part of it. An expert conclusion conflicts with an underlying report. A contemporaneous note independently supports part of one account.
03
Match facts to specific policy language
Employment and mechanism facts in the file may connect to a condition, definition, exclusion, or insuring provision. ChronoLaw surfaces those facts against the uploaded policy.
04
Ask a question, then open the source
The claimed wage loss does not line up with the wage statements. Follow the finding to the note, the report, or the policy form.
Different questions require different kinds of analysis.
What that investigation reveals, from several angles.
Policy intelligence
What may connect to a provision? Employment and mechanism facts, against a condition, definition, exclusion, or insuring provision in the uploaded form.
Contradiction intelligence
Where do the accounts conflict? The first report and the later statement.
Corroborating-evidence intelligence
What is independently supported? A contemporaneous note, not a restatement of the first account. Repetition is not corroboration.
Missing-evidence intelligence
What appears missing or unsupported? A report referenced in the notes is not in the uploaded material. An apparent absence is not proof that something never occurred.
Financial intelligence
Do the records reconcile? The claimed wage loss and the wage statements.
Questions across the claim
What do you still need to ask? What changed after the last assessment, or how the expert conclusion lines up with the underlying material, then open the source.
Before authority is exercised.
Once you have seen the changing account, the policy-relevant facts, and any mismatches, the question is when the results are needed.
01
Before reserve review
See what changed since the prior assessment: the later statement, the expert conflict, the wage question. Inspect the evidence behind those changes.
Before coverage analysis or settlement authority
Bring policy-relevant facts, conflicting accounts, and the uploaded form into the same review. Surface the current evidentiary picture, including financial support and corroboration, before authority is exercised.
Before litigation referral or supervisor review
Give the reviewer or counsel a source-grounded view of the important conflicts, corroborating evidence, policy issues, and changes in the file.
When the claim file changes
Add the new material and regenerate the relevant intelligence so the expanded file is incorporated. ChronoLaw does not continuously rewrite findings on its own.
Open the underlying source behind a finding.
If analysis flagged a conflict between the first report and a later statement, or a wage figure that does not reconcile, open those sources. ChronoLaw’s analysis may use probabilistic AI and can be imperfect. It does not claim perfect accuracy. It does not set reserves, determine coverage, liability, or compensability, value claims, or exercise settlement authority. Coverage stays your call.
- No customer data used to train AI models
- HIPAA-compliant workflows. A BAA is available to all users, including trial users.
- Encryption in transit and at rest
- US-based infrastructure
- Clear distinction between claim-fact analysis and regulatory guidance
Security detail lives on the Security page.
Run a closed claim you already know.
Do not judge ChronoLaw by a polished generated document. Run a claim whose facts, policy issues, conflicts, expert material, financial questions, and outcome you already know, and compare what it surfaces with your own reading of the file.
ChronoLaw is $300 per user per month. Up to about 30,000 pages per seat each month. No overage charges.
On the litigation side? See ChronoLaw for litigation teams