Real Results from Real Law Firms
See how litigation teams are using ChronoLaw to save time, reduce costs, and win more cases.
Representative Case Studies
(Not tied to any specific firm or client — based on real usage patterns from early users of ChronoLaw.)
Civil Litigation — Large-Scale Discovery Review
Scenario (Representative Example): A litigation team receives a production of ~40,000 pages across PDFs, emails, and spreadsheets.
Workflow Without ChronoLaw:
- •Paralegals spend 2–4 days skimming and organizing
- •Attorney review takes 1–2 weeks
- •Chronologies built manually — prone to missing documents
- •Re-review required for each additional discovery supplement
Workflow With ChronoLaw:
- ✓Documents uploaded asynchronously
- ✓Automatic text extraction → embedding → encryption
- ✓Hierarchical summarizer creates multi-level summaries: Document → Period → Era → Full chronology
- ✓Citations mapped to filenames + page numbers
- ✓Attorneys ask natural-language questions ("When was X communicated?")
Outcome (Typical):
- ✓40,000-page dataset processed in ~4 hours
- ✓Chronology drafted same day
- ✓Attorneys identify 14 previously overlooked documents
Employment Dispute — Key Communications Timeline
Scenario (Representative Example): HR investigation involves Slack messages, emails, policy documents, and meeting notes.
Workflow Without ChronoLaw:
- •Manual sorting through multiple sources
- •Timeline constructed in spreadsheets
- •Ambiguity around exact dates and supporting documents
Workflow With ChronoLaw:
- ✓Unified ingestion: emails + PDFs + chat logs
- ✓Conversation viewer and Q&A with inline citations
- ✓Automatic chronology grouped by "Period" (e.g., Pre-Complaint → Complaint → Investigation → Termination)
Outcome (Typical):
- ✓2-day manual review reduced to 45 minutes
- ✓Counsel receives a clean, citation-linked chronology
- ✓Faster preliminary assessment → quicker resolution strategy
Internal Investigation — Multi-Source Fact Reconstruction
Scenario (Representative Example): General counsel needs to understand events around a potential misuse of funds. Material includes financial spreadsheets, invoices, emails, and interview summaries.
Workflow Without ChronoLaw:
- •Multiple systems, difficult to unify
- •Data inconsistencies slow decision-making
- •Attorneys waste time searching instead of reasoning
Workflow With ChronoLaw:
- ✓Spreadsheets auto-converted and chunked for extraction
- ✓Narrative summary for every document
- ✓Era-level synthesis revealing relationships between financial records and communications
- ✓Natural language Q&A ("Which invoices correlate with the disputed transactions?")
Outcome (Typical):
- ✓Key discrepancies uncovered immediately
- ✓Partners receive a clean investigative report same day
- ✓Early risk assessment improves settlement posture
Become an Early Featured Case Study
We are actively selecting early users to feature in our first published case studies.
If your firm is using — or considering using — ChronoLaw, you can become one of our first highlighted success stories.
Early partners receive:
- ✓White-glove onboarding
- ✓Priority access to new features
- ✓Co-branded case studies once results are confirmed
- ✓Optional private publication (anonymized)
Or contact us directly at support@chrono-law.com